Next: Can I fake multi-byte character support?, Previous: Are certain equivalent patterns faster than others?, Up: FAQ [Contents][Index]
To: Adoram Rogel <adoram@hybridge.com> Subject: Re: Flex 2.5.2 performance questions In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 19 Sep 96 10:16:04 EDT. Date: Thu, 19 Sep 96 09:58:00 PDT From: Vern Paxson <vern> > a lot about the backing up problem. > I believe that there lies my biggest problem, and I'll try to improve > it. Since you have variable trailing context, this is a bigger performance problem. Fixing it is usually easier than fixing backing up, which in a complicated scanner (yours seems to fit the bill) can be extremely difficult to do correctly. You also don't mention what flags you are using for your scanner. -f makes a large speed difference, and -Cfe buys you nearly as much speed but the resulting scanner is considerably smaller. > I have an | operator in {and} and in {pats} so both of them are variable > length. -p should have reported this. > Is changing one of them to fixed-length is enough ? Yes. > Is it possible to change the 32,000 states limit ? Yes. I've appended instructions on how. Before you make this change, though, you should think about whether there are ways to fundamentally simplify your scanner - those are certainly preferable! Vern To increase the 32K limit (on a machine with 32 bit integers), you increase the magnitude of the following in flexdef.h: #define JAMSTATE -32766 /* marks a reference to the state that always jams */ #define MAXIMUM_MNS 31999 #define BAD_SUBSCRIPT -32767 #define MAX_SHORT 32700 Adding a 0 or two after each should do the trick.
Next: Can I fake multi-byte character support?, Previous: Are certain equivalent patterns faster than others?, Up: FAQ [Contents][Index]